This analysis compares deep learning and radiomics models for predicting survival in glioma patients, suggesting that CNN models may offer viable accuracy for patient selection.
Motivation: Markers to predict overall survival (OS) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) patients undergoing immunotherapy, are needed to help select patients for trials and personalize treatment. Goal(s): To evaluate and compare deep learning and radiomic models for OS prediction in recurrent HGG, using manual segmentation, automated segmentation, and an end-to-end deep learning approach. Approach: We developed a segmentation-free CNN model, and radiomics models using features extracted from manually and CNN-segmented ROIs. We compared accuracy of OS prediction in 154 patients. Results: Radiomics from manual segmentation was more accurate than automated methods. The end-to-end CNN model achieved similar performance to the robust-feature manual-segmentation-based radiomics model. Impact: End-to-end CNN models can produce similar accuracy in recurrent HGG patient survival prediction during immunotherapy, compared to robust-feature radiomics from manual segmentation, and may add value in initial patient selection for immunotherapy trials, and personalization of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: