Bibliometric analysis shows trends in plant-based feed for livestock, highlighting its role in sustainability and food security.
This bibliometric review research analyzes trends related to “Plant-Based Feed and Forage for Livestock,” utilizing research data from 2013 to 2024. Eighty-two (82) English language journal articles indexed in Scopus were utilized as data. This study focuses on publications in agricultural and environmental sciences. The study aimed to identify all keywords, author keywords, authors, and countries related to research on plant-based feed and forage. It was calculated using VOSviewer to determine density, network, and overlay. This highlights the growing importance of sustainable alternative feed. This bibliometric review highlights the role of plant-based feed and forage in contributing to a sustainable livestock production system, supporting Sustainable Development Goal 2 (Zero Hunger) by enhancing food security through resilient and efficient resource feeding strategies. Shifting to resource-intensive conventional feeds that are environmentally friendly alternatives contributes to SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). Additionally, reducing greenhouse gas emissions through adaptation of plant-based feed for livestock production, aligned with SGD 13 (Climate Action), and promoting land use practices that reduce deforestation and preserve biodiversity, supports SDG 15 (Life on Land). Mapping the co-citation network and overlaying this research topic provides insights into the development and dissemination of new knowledge in agriculture. Analysis identifies emerging trends and gaps in current research, suggesting areas for future investigation. Overall, this bibliometric review provides a comprehensive overview of the diverse research landscape on plant-based feed and forage for livestock production, specifically for ruminant animals, in temperate and tropical regions. It emphasizes alignment between this research and sustainable goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chona P. Napalinga (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: