Probabilistic framework evaluates economic loss and damage from seismic and wind hazards in coastal regions, indicating significant variability.
The dynamic environment of coastal regions subjects infrastructure to multiple interacting natural hazards, with the simultaneous occurrence of windstorms and earthquakes posing a particularly critical challenge. Unlike inland hazards, these coastal threats frequently exhibit irregular statistical behavior and terrain-induced anomalies. This study proposes a novel probabilistic framework to assess compound hazard effects, advancing beyond traditional single-hazard analyses. By integrating maximum entropy theory with bivariate Copula models, a unified return period analysis is developed to capture the joint probability structure of seismic and wind events. The model is calibrated using long-term observational data collected from a representative coastal zone since 2000. For the PGA marginal distribution, our sixth-moment maximum-entropy model achieved an R2 of 0.90, compared with 0.57 for a conventional GEV fit—reflecting a 58% increase in explained variance. Analysis shows the progressive evolution of damage from slight damaged through moderate damaged and severe damaged to collapse for an 18-story reinforced concrete frame structure, and shows that the combined effect of seismic and wind loads results in risk probabilities of aforementioned damage state of approximately 2 × 10−3, 6 × 10−4, 2 × 10−4, and 3 × 10−5, respectively, under a 0.4 g ground motion and a concurrent wind speed of 15 m/s. Furthermore, when both the uncertainty of loss ratios and structural parameters are incorporated, the standard deviation of the economic loss ratio reaches up to 0.015 in the transition region (PGA 0.2–0.4 g), highlighting considerable variability in economic loss assessment, whereas the mean economic loss ratio rapidly saturates above 0.8 with increasing PGA. These findings demonstrate that uncertainty in economic loss is most pronounced within the transition region, while remaining much lower outside this zone. Overall, this study provides a robust framework and quantitative basis for comprehensive risk assessment and resilient design of coastal infrastructure under compound wind and seismic hazards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: