PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Users’ Perspectives on Primary Care and Public Health Services in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study with Implications for Healthcare Quality Assessment

View Full Paper
IFIgor Fradique Leandro FerrazMRMariana Crespo RaimundoNBNelson Barros

Key Points

  • Participants reported favorable access to the unified health system with 54.5% female respondents and 25.1% using vaccination services.
  • Analysis showed significant variation in perceived service quality, with lower socioeconomic status correlating with more positive evaluations.
  • Cross-sectional study conducted with a structured questionnaire on 1,000 participants between August 2023 and August 2024.
  • Regional disparities in perceptions of public health services highlight critical areas for improvement and social participation.

Abstract

This study focuses on the Unified Health System (SUS) in five regions of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, one of Brazil’s most important states, as part of a comprehensive analysis of a research project, which has generated publications in earlier phases. The objective was to assess users’ perceptions of SUS in terms of access to and the quality of public health services, including primary care and pharmaceutical services. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire comprising 66 questions, administered to a purposive sample of 1000 participants between August 2023 and August 2024. Data were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test with R software version 4.3. Among the participants, 54.5% were female, 62.5% were aged between 26 and 60 years, and 29% reported having private health insurance. Vaccination services were the most frequently used SUS service (25.1% of respondents). Participants who reported more frequent use of SUS services rated access more positively than those who used them less frequently (p = 0.002). The regions that evaluated SUS access and quality most favorably were Middle Paraíba and the metropolitan region, while the Coastal Lowlands region received the most negative assessments. Participants with lower socioeconomic status gave more favorable evaluations of access to public health services (p = 0.001). These findings highlight concerns about access to, and the quality of, SUS healthcare services and regional disparities in users’ perceptions of SUS services in Rio de Janeiro. The results underscore the importance of social participation as a key element in the evaluation and continuous improvement of responsive public healthcare.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ferraz et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45e6a31b076d99fa5f111https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091424
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper