Analysis of kaon decay reveals constraints on dark matter models with scalar bosons, suggesting implications for future experiments.
We explore the constraints on new physics from the recent NA62 observation of the kaon decay <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msup><a:mrow><a:mi>K</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:mrow></a:msup><a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo><a:msup><a:mrow><a:mi>π</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:mrow></a:msup><a:mo>+</a:mo><a:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike" other="updiag1"><a:mrow><a:mi>E</a:mi></a:mrow></a:menclose></a:mrow></a:math> with missing energy <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mrow><f:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike" other="updiag1"><f:mrow><f:mi>E</f:mi></f:mrow></f:menclose></f:mrow></f:math> in the context of a dark-matter (DM) scenario recently used to accommodate the Belle II finding of an enhanced rate of the <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:mi>b</j:mi></j:math>-meson decay <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mrow><l:msup><l:mrow><l:mi>B</l:mi></l:mrow><l:mrow><l:mo>+</l:mo></l:mrow></l:msup><l:mo stretchy="false">→</l:mo><l:msup><l:mrow><l:mi>K</l:mi></l:mrow><l:mrow><l:mo>+</l:mo></l:mrow></l:msup><l:mo>+</l:mo><l:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike" other="updiag1"><l:mrow><l:mi>E</l:mi></l:mrow></l:menclose></l:mrow></l:math> compared to the standard-model expectation. Specifically, assuming that a light real scalar boson <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>ϕ</q:mi></q:math> plays the role of DM and working in an effective field-theory framework, we study model independently the impact of operators involving <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:mi>ϕ</s:mi></s:math> and ordinary quarks on the aforementioned transitions over the kaon mode’s kinematical mass region of <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mrow><u:msub><u:mrow><u:mi>m</u:mi></u:mrow><u:mrow><u:mi>ϕ</u:mi></u:mrow></u:msub><u:mo><</u:mo><u:mo stretchy="false">(</u:mo><u:msub><u:mrow><u:mi>m</u:mi></u:mrow><u:mrow><u:mi>K</u:mi></u:mrow></u:msub><u:mo>−</u:mo><u:msub><u:mrow><u:mi>m</u:mi></u:mrow><u:mrow><u:mi>π</u:mi></u:mrow></u:msub><u:mo stretchy="false">)</u:mo><u:mo>/</u:mo><u:mn>2</u:mn><u:mo>=</u:mo><u:mn>177</u:mn><u:mtext> </u:mtext><u:mtext> </u:mtext><u:mi>MeV</u:mi></u:mrow></u:math>. Such a DM particle is subject to significant restrictions from the observed relic abundance and from DM direct-detection experiments incorporating the Migdal effect, as well as from indirect searches in cosmic microwave background data and collider experiments, except when its mass is between 110 and 146 MeV. We demonstrate that <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:msup><y:mi>K</y:mi><y:mo>+</y:mo></y:msup><y:mo stretchy="false">→</y:mo><y:msup><y:mi>π</y:mi><y:mo>+</y:mo></y:msup><y:mi>ϕ</y:mi><y:mi>ϕ</y:mi></y:math> can saturate the new-physics window in the NA62 result if <bb:math xmlns:bb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><bb:msub><bb:mi>m</bb:mi><bb:mi>ϕ</bb:mi></bb:msub></bb:math> lies in the 110–130 MeV portion of the range left by the DM constraints, thus providing a complementary constraint on this scenario. Improved data from future Belle II and NA62 measurements and DM quests can test it more stringently. In particular, expanding the NA62 signal window into the region that is now removed due to three-body decay background modes could further explore the remaining mass window for this type of invisible particle, <db:math xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><db:mn>130</db:mn><db:mo><</db:mo><db:msub><db:mi>m</db:mi><db:mi>ϕ</db:mi></db:msub><db:mo><</db:mo><db:mn>177</db:mn><db:mtext> </db:mtext><db:mtext> </db:mtext><db:mi>MeV</db:mi></db:math>.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: