We investigate dark matter (DM-)electron scattering in a minimal <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>U</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>1</a:mn><a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo><a:mi>X</a:mi></a:msub></a:math> extension of the Standard Model (SM), where the DM can appear as a Majorana fermion, a complex singlet scalar, or a Dirac fermion. To study bounds on the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>U</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">(</e:mo><e:mn>1</e:mn><e:msub><e:mo stretchy="false">)</e:mo><e:mi>X</e:mi></e:msub></e:math> gauge coupling <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mo stretchy="false">(</i:mo><i:msub><i:mi>g</i:mi><i:mi>X</i:mi></i:msub><i:mo stretchy="false">)</i:mo></i:math> and new gauge boson mass <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi>M</m:mi><m:msup><m:mi>Z</m:mi><m:mo>′</m:mo></m:msup></m:msub><m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo></m:math>, from DM-electron scattering, we consider several direct search experiments like CDMS, DAMIC, SENSEI, PandaX-II, DarkSide-50, and XENON1T-S2 for different <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>U</q:mi><q:mo stretchy="false">(</q:mo><q:mn>1</q:mn><q:msub><q:mo stretchy="false">)</q:mo><q:mi>X</q:mi></q:msub></q:math> charges. In this setup, we consider DM production via freeze-in in both radiation-dominated and modified cosmological background to project sensitivities onto <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:msub><u:mi>g</u:mi><u:mi>X</u:mi></u:msub><u:mo>−</u:mo><u:msub><u:mi>M</u:mi><u:msup><u:mi>Z</u:mi><u:mo>′</u:mo></u:msup></u:msub></u:math> plane satisfying observed relic abundance. DM-electron scattering could provide comparable, or even stronger, bounds compared to those obtained from the electron/muon (<w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:mrow><w:mi>g</w:mi><w:mo>−</w:mo><w:mn>2</w:mn></w:mrow></w:math>), low-energy scattering, and intensity frontier experiments within <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:mrow><y:mn>0.01</y:mn><y:mtext> </y:mtext><y:mtext> </y:mtext><y:mi>GeV</y:mi><y:mo>≲</y:mo><y:msub><y:mi>M</y:mi><y:msup><y:mi>Z</y:mi><y:mo>′</y:mo></y:msup></y:msub><y:mo>≲</y:mo><y:mn>0.1</y:mn><y:mtext> </y:mtext><y:mtext> </y:mtext><y:mi>GeV</y:mi></y:mrow></y:math>. Constrains from freeze-in could provide stronger sensitivities for <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:msub><ab:mi>M</ab:mi><ab:msup><ab:mi>Z</ab:mi><ab:mo>′</ab:mo></ab:msup></ab:msub><ab:mo>≳</ab:mo><ab:mi mathvariant="script">O</ab:mi><ab:mo stretchy="false">(</ab:mo><ab:mn>1</ab:mn><ab:mo stretchy="false">)</ab:mo><ab:mtext> </ab:mtext><ab:mtext> </ab:mtext><ab:mi>GeV</ab:mi></ab:math>; however, these limits are comparable to those obtained from LHCb and LEP experiments for <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:mrow><fb:mi mathvariant="script">O</fb:mi><fb:mo stretchy="false">(</fb:mo><fb:mn>10</fb:mn><fb:mo stretchy="false">)</fb:mo><fb:mtext> </fb:mtext><fb:mtext> </fb:mtext><fb:mi>GeV</fb:mi><fb:mo>≲</fb:mo><fb:msub><fb:mrow><fb:mi>M</fb:mi></fb:mrow><fb:mrow><fb:msup><fb:mrow><fb:mi>Z</fb:mi></fb:mrow><fb:mrow><fb:mo>′</fb:mo></fb:mrow></fb:msup></fb:mrow></fb:msub><fb:mo>≲</fb:mo><fb:mn>150</fb:mn><fb:mtext> </fb:mtext><fb:mtext> </fb:mtext><fb:mi>GeV</fb:mi></fb:mrow></fb:math>. In the future, electron-muon scattering (MUonE), proton (FASER and DUNE), and electron/positron (ILC) beam-dump experiments could probe these parameters. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barman et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: