Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 18, 2025Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Review of chatbots in urogynecology

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JKJoseph T. KowalskiLBLeanne Brechtel

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Review evaluates chatbot capabilities in urogynecology, indicating potential for patient education and clinical decision-making.

Key Points

  • Chatbots can provide patient education on urogynecology but may generate misleading information up to 33% of the time.
  • Research on chatbots in urogynecology highlights their utility in clinical decision-making despite accuracy concerns.
  • Evaluations show that chatbots handle information about prolapse and urinary incontinence effectively but still have limitations.
  • Current studies indicate that while chatbots are beneficial, caution is needed in their application for urogynecology.

Cite This Study

Kowalski et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d461cb31b076d99fa61374https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000001067
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Using Chatbot to Better Understand What Matters Most to Urogynecologic Patients2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Chatbot Use by Patients Seeking Urogynecologic Consultation: A Randomized Trial2026
  3. 3Readability, Accuracy, and Completeness of Urogynecology Health Information Provided Through Patient-Driven Interaction With an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot2026
  4. 4Chatbots Utility in Healthcare Industry: An Umbrella Review2024 · 25 citations
  5. 5Improving Pelvic Floor Disorder Education: A Second Pilot of a Retrieval-Augmented AI Chatbot Model2026