PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Symmetry3 citationsOpen Access

Parametric Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Hollow Piers Based on an Axial–Flexure–Shear Model Under Cyclic Loading and Earthquake Conditions

View Full Paper
ZPZhiyuan PanQQQiming QiLDLian Duan

Key Points

  • The axial–flexure–shear model accurately captures hysteretic curves of reinforced concrete hollow piers under loading.
  • Sensitivity analysis shows aspect ratio and wall thickness have major effects on seismic responses amid variable peak ground accelerations.
  • The analytical model effectively evaluates reinforced concrete hollow piers, emphasizing flexure-shear coupling during earthquakes.
  • Parameter influences are consistent under cyclic loading and strong earthquakes, highlighting design considerations for durability.

Abstract

To enhance the understanding of the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) hollow piers, a sensitivity analysis of design parameters is conducted. A novel analytical model named the Axial–Flexure–Shear-Interaction-Membrane-Beam-Truss-Element-Model (AFSI-MBTEM) is proposed to account for the flexure–shear coupling. To avoid size effects, three full-scale rectangular RC hollow piers are simulated and validated using the AFSI-MBTEM. Based on a benchmark model, the influence of parameters on seismic responses is explored under cyclic loading, earthquakes, and different PGAs. The AFSI-MBTEM can efficiently and accurately capture the symmetric and asymmetric hysteretic curves of RC hollow piers. The influence of parameters under cyclic loading is generally consistent with that under strong earthquakes. The aspect ratio, width-to-depth ratio, wall thickness ratio, axial load ratio, and longitudinal rebar ratio have a significant influence under cyclic loading, earthquakes, and different PGAs. The influence of stirrup ratio, concrete strength, and longitudinal rebar strength becomes clear under earthquakes, especially for residual deformation. The suggested parameter values for hollow piers are as follows: aspect ratio of 4–6, width-to-depth ratio of 1.0–2.0, wall thickness ratio of 20–40%, axial load ratio of 0.05–0.10, longitudinal rebar ratio of 1.2–2.2%, stirrup ratio of 0.8–1.2%, concrete strength of C40, and longitudinal rebar strength of 400 MPa and 500 MPa.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d463db31b076d99fa62bfehttps://doi.org/10.3390/sym17091553
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The April 14th, 2010 Yushu earthquake, a devastating earthquake with foreshocks2010 · 33 citations
  2. 2Seismic assessment of tall pier bridges with double-column bents retrofitted with buckling restrained braces subjected to near-fault motions2020 · 63 citations
  3. 3Cyclic tests on large‐scale models of existing bridge piers with rectangular hollow cross‐section2003 · 77 citations
  4. 4Experimental and Numerical Studies on the Seismic Response of R.C. Hollow Bridge Piers2005 · 92 citations
  5. 5Investigation on seismic behavior of bridge piers with thin-walled rectangular hollow section using quasi-static cyclic tests2019 · 61 citations