Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals UV exposure significantly worsens toxicity from low-dose Cr(VI) in skin, indicating health risks.
Chromium(VI) [Cr(VI)] is a well-documented environmental carcinogen linked to DNA damage, oxidative stress, and systemic toxicity. Existing risk assessments predominantly focus on single-factor high-dose occupational exposures, while it is usually overlooked that Cr(VI) exists at a low level and coexists with environmental factors in real-world scenarios; thus, assessing the synergistic toxicity of low-dose Cr(VI) with coexposure is imperative. Herein, we reveal that UV irradiation critically amplifies the toxicity of low-dose Cr(VI) at both the molecular and tissue levels. Integrated in vitro and in vivo models, we demonstrate that UV-induced redox cycling of Cr(VI) generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing DNA and protein cleavage, cytotoxicity, and skin barrier damage. Notably, acute UV–Cr(VI) coexposure compromises skin barrier function, evidenced by a 50% increase in transepidermal water loss and disorganized stratum corneum ultrastructure (epidermal thickening, aberrant basal cell activation, and infiltration of inflammatory cells). These findings establish UV as a critical enhancer of Cr(VI) toxicity, revealing the synergistic toxicity of low-dose Cr(VI) and UV irradiation at molecular and tissue levels and challenging the traditional threshold-based safety Cr(VI) dosage. This work emphasizes the urgent need to re-evaluate environmental Cr(VI) risks under real-world light-exposed scenarios, with implications for sunscreen formulations, occupational safety guidelines, and ecological regulations in the face of growing environmental challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jie et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: