The Dual Seven Democratic Dimensions Index measures democratic quality by combining expert evaluations and citizen experiences.
Existing democracy indices often conflate essential democratic principles with governance outcomes, limiting both their conceptual precision and diagnostic utility. This article introduces the Dual Seven Democratic Dimensions Index, a novel framework that disentangles core democratic foundations—such as inclusive suffrage, civil liberties, accountability, and deliberative participation—from broader measures of state performance. The index employs a dual-assessment methodology: it combines a normatively grounded evaluation of legal-constitutional structures with citizen-generated scores reflecting lived democratic experience. By integrating institutional and experiential dimensions, this approach responds to longstanding critiques of minimalism, expert bias, and Western-centrism in democracy measurement. The result is a more transparent, theoretically robust tool for assessing democratic quality across diverse contexts. At a time of global democratic erosion and the proliferation of hybrid regimes, the index offers scholars and policymakers a refined metric for identifying both resilience and vulnerability in democratic systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galiñanes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: