Quantitative research identifies clothing selection and budgeting factors influencing female students' wardrobe planning.
Purpose: This study explored the wardrobe planning practices of students at RLAK Government College of Home Economics, focusing on their approaches to wardrobe organization, clothing selection, budgeting, and factors influencing their choices. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative research design was employed. A total of 160 female students, 40 from each academic section (First year to BSc final year), were randomly selected. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, entered into the EPI program, and exported to SPSS for analysis. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to examine students’ wardrobe planning behaviors and decision-making processes. Findings: Most students applied their academic knowledge in wardrobe planning. They considered family budget, personal preferences, and principles from home economics education when making clothing decisions. Students preferred quality fabrics and selected items that suited them best. Overall, they demonstrated awareness of practical and economic factors, efficiently organizing their wardrobes. Conclusion: Home economics education positively influenced students’ wardrobe planning habits, promoting informed and practical clothing decisions. Research limitations/implications: The study was limited to female students from a single institution, which may affect generalizability. Future research could include male students and multiple institutions for broader insights. Practical implications: Findings can guide educators in integrating wardrobe management skills into home economics curricula and support students in making informed clothing choices. Contribution to literature: The study provides empirical evidence on how education, budgeting, and personal values shape wardrobe planning behaviors among young adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khadija Muhammad Hussain Marvi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: