Randomized trial assessed gingival inflammation via IL-6 levels and histomorphology in 13 volunteers, suggesting LED whitening may spare tissue damage.
This split-mouth randomized study evaluated the effect of in-office tooth whitening with violet Light-Emitting Diode (LED) on gingival inflammation, assessed by gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) interleukin-6 (IL-6) level, histomorphology, and immunohistochemical analysis of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α) and Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) expression, with and without gingival barrier protection. Thirteen volunteers requiring gingivoplasty were included. The whitening procedure was performed with parameters of 400 nm, 134J/cm2, and 20 cycles of 30 sec with 60 sec of standby. Gingival surgery was performed 48 h post-whitening for histomorphology analysis, while GCF IL-6 levels were quantified using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). We also attempted immunohistochemical analysis of TNF-α and CD8 expression; however, the small gingival specimens, which were primarily epithelial tissue, limited the reliability of the results. No statistically significant differences were observed between sides for histomorphology or GCF IL-6. These findings suggest that LED whitening without a gingival barrier may not induce gingival inflammation. However, further studies with larger and gender-balanced samples, extended time points, and additional cytokine markers are needed to confirm these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: