Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This pilot study explores testing and countertransference dynamics in psychoanalysis, suggesting new interpretations.
A clinical phenomenon introduced by Weiss in 1971 as testing the validity of pathogenic beliefs in the therapeutic relationship is connected to the psychoanalytic concept of enactment and is investigated empirically. Six psychoanalysts not affiliated with Control-Mastery Theory (CMT) are questioned about how patients repeat relational constellations with the analyst and which self- and object-representations they reactivate. Drawing on two prior studies, analyses of case vignettes and of transcribed psychotherapy sessions, a list of test incidents served as a questionnaire. Results show new manifestations of tests and novel perspectives on previously documented ones. Excessive self-confidence and pseudo-independence as pathological patterns as well as defensive aspects should be included in the clinical profile of testing. In contrast to recent research on CMT, we do not exclude interpretation as a means of passing tests and do not equate negative patient reactions with failing a test. The connection to clinical studies of other psychoanalytic approaches and the results of the current study allow for a more comprehensive depiction of this clinical phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: