Numerical simulations reveal improved energy efficiency via optimal phase change materials configurations.
The study explores the integration of phase change materials in a solar water heater to store energy via latent heat and release it as needed. Numerical simulations compare three configurations of a thin phase change materials layer. The melting rate, the evolution of the outlet temperature, and the fluid phase change materials heat transfer are analyzed. Configuration 2 shows controlled melting at 82%, thanks to a stable heat flux (2 W m −2 ) and optimized transfer, limiting losses. Configuration 1 melts at 1% (inefficient heat capture), and configuration 3 at 25% irregularly, with unstable flows. These results highlight the importance of the phase change materials location: configuration 2, by balancing storage and release, improves the energy efficiency of the system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebbar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: