Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis reveals light color significantly affects upper and lower lip measurements in adults, indicating standardization is essential for accuracy.
Objectives: This study evaluated the effects of light intensity and color on facial dimensions measured along three axes (X, Y, and Z) using a structured-light 3D facial scanner. Methods: Forty-seven adults (mean age 25.7±3.4 years) underwent facial scanning under two light intensities (500 and 700 lux) and two light colors (daylight and cool white) generated from a softbox photography lighting setup. The scans were performed in a room illuminated with ambient daylight-color LED at 300 lux without external light interference. Facial measurements were analyzed using Dolphin Imaging Software. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the effects of light intensity, light color, and their interactions on facial measurements. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Light intensity had no significant effect on 3D facial measurements (p>0.05). However, light color significantly influenced upper lip anterior-true vertical line through the alar base (ULA-TVL) and lower lip anterior-true vertical line through the alar base (LLA-TVL) measurements along the Z axis (p<0.05), with greater values recorded under daylight compared to cool white. No significant interaction effect between light intensity and light color was observed (p>0.05). Conclusions: Light color influences upper and lower lip protrusion measurements in 3D facial scanning with a structured-light 3D facial scanner, whereas light intensity does not. Standardizing light color is recommended for consistent measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pongsermsuk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: