This analysis reveals the energy absorption capacities in syntactic foams, highlighting impacts from cenosphere and rubber crumb additives.
Syntactic foams reinforced with industrial waste-derived cenospheres and rubber crumb fillers present a promising pathway for developing lightweight, impact-resistant materials. However, a comprehensive comparison of their energy absorption characteristics under low velocity impact (LVI) loading remains underexplored. This study investigates the LVI response of syntactic foams with varying volume fractions (20%, 40%, and 60%) of cenospheres (SFC) and rubber crumb (SFR), benchmarked against neat epoxy (NE). The key findings indicate that rubber crumb-reinforced foams (SFR60) exhibit the highest absorbed energy of 16.75 J at an impact energy of 118.82 J, surpassing the NE (6.46 J), indicating superior impact dissipation. Cenosphere-based foams (SFC60) achieve the highest specific energy absorption (SEA) of 0.0115 Jm³/kg, a 117% improvement over NE (0.0053 Jm³/kg), due to their lower density and increasing filler content from 20% to 60% significantly enhances both absorbed energy and SEA, with cenosphere-reinforced foams exhibiting higher efficiency per unit mass. These findings highlight the performance trade-offs between energy absorption capacity and material efficiency, providing valuable insights for designing sustainable syntactic foams for aerospace, automotive, and protective applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vishwas Mahesh (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: