Analysis demonstrates the placement of hybrid nodes in hybridization cycles, suggesting improved sampling strategies.
Phylogenetic networks encode a broader picture of evolution by the inclusion of reticulate processes such as hybridization, introgression or horizontal gene transfer. Each hybridization event is represented by a “hybridization cycle”. Here, we investigate the statistical identifiability of the position of the hybrid node in a 4-node hybridization cycle in a semi-directed level-1 phylogenetic network. That is, we investigate if our model is able to detect the correct placement of the hybrid node in the hybridization cycle using quartet concordance factors as data. In the current study, we prove that the correct placement of the hybrid node in 4-node hybridization cycles, included in level-1 phylogenetic networks, is generically identifiable if the assumptions are non-restrictive such as t∈(0,∞) for all branch (or edge) lengths and γ∈(0,1) for the inheritance probability of the hybrid edges. However, simulations show that accurate detection of these cycles can be complicated by inadequate sampling, small sample size or gene tree estimation error. We identify practical advice for evolutionary biologists on best sampling strategies to improve the detection of this type of hybridization cycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiley et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: