Systematic review reveals distinct epidemiologic and clinical findings in localized versus systemic osteoarticular infections caused by Sporothrix.
Knowledge of the clinical recognition and management of osteoarticular sporotrichosis is derived from case reports and limited series. Our aim was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the differences in epidemiologic and clinical findings between localized and systemic forms of osteoarticular sporotrichosis. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science (WoS), Ovid, SCiELO, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, CQVIP and xueshu.baidu.com on 31 December 2023. The retrieved case data was divided into two groups: (1) localized osteoarticular infection and (2) systemic osteoarticular infection. We estimated differences between the two groups using generalized linear models with Poisson distribution for robust variances to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). A total of 111 cases of localized infection and 100 cases of systemic infection were included. Individuals with systemic infection were more likely to be from hyperendemic areas (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.24-2.18; p = 0.001), have HIV infection (aPR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.42-3.82; p = 0.001), and have cancer (aPR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.09-3.31; p = 0.023). Arthritis (50.4%) and osteomyelitis (46.0%) were predominant in localized and systemic infections, respectively. Osteomyelitis in 2 or more bones was more common in individuals with a systemic infection (aPR = 10.3; 95% CI, 3.38-31.7; p < 0.0001). Most cases of localized infection were treated with combination antifungals and surgery (32.2%), combination antifungals (25.3%) and amphotericin B monotherapy (19.1%), and systemic infection with combination antifungals (49.4%). As for the outcome, there were better outcomes in localized than in systemic infection. Therefore, Sporothrix infection should be considered in the differential diagnosis of osteomyelitis or arthritis, especially in immunocompromised patients from hyperendemic areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramírez-Soto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: