This method enables patterned nanostructures with 75 nm half-pitch, suggesting improvements in photonic and sensing applications.
Micro- and nanopatterning is crucial for advanced photonic, electronic, and sensing devices. Yet achieving large-area periodic nanostructures with a 75 nm half-pitch on low-cost laboratory systems remains difficult, because conventional near-ultraviolet laser interference lithography (LIL) suffers from Gaussian-beam non-uniformity and a narrow exposure latitude. Here, we report a cost-effective deep-ultraviolet (DUV) dual-beam LIL system based on a 266 nm laser and diffractive flat-top beam shaping, enabling large-area patterning of periodical nanostructures. At this wavelength, a moderate half-angle can be chosen to preserve a large beam-overlap region while still delivering 150 nm period (75 nm half-pitch) structures. By independently tuning the incident angle and beam uniformity, we pattern one-dimensional (1D) gratings and two-dimensional (2D) arrays over a Ø 1.0 cm field with critical-dimension variation < 5 nm (1σ), smooth edges, and near-vertical sidewalls. As a proof of concept, we transfer a 2D pattern into Si to create non-metal-coated nanodot arrays that serve as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrates. The arrays deliver an average enhancement factor of ~1.12 × 104 with 11% intensity relative standard deviation (RSD) over 65 sampling points, a performance near the upper limit of all-dielectric SERS substrates. The proposed method overcomes the uneven hotspot distribution and complex fabrication procedures in conventional SERS substrates, enabling reliable and large-area chemical sensing. Compared to electron-beam lithography, the flat-top DUV-LIL approach offers orders-of-magnitude higher throughput at a fraction of the cost, while its centimeter-scale uniformity can be scaled to full wafers with larger beam-shaping optics. These attributes position the method as a versatile and economical route to large-area photonic metasurfaces and sensing devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: