Research reveals a blended PVDF membrane with improved flux and rejection rates for wastewater treatment.
Leveraging the hydrophilivity of methacryloxyethyl ammonium chloride (DMC), a PVDF‐g‐DMC copolymer was synthesized via alkali treatment and then blended with PVDF. A blended membrane was prepared using the non‐solvent induced phase seperation (NIPS) method. This membrane exhibited a pure‐water flux of 355.33 L/(m 2 ·h), significantly exceeding that of a pure PVDF membrane (203.12 L/(m 2 ·h)). The surface zeta potential of the blended membrane was −27.5 mV, indicating a reduced negative charge compared to PVDF membrane (−33.2 mV). The blended membrane also demonstrated superior performance with a BSA rejection rate of 91.65% (vs. 68.22% for PVDF membrane), enhanced antifouling properties, and a flux recovery rate (FRR) of 72.39%. Furthermore, the blended membrane showed improved acid acid and alkali resistance, with significantly smaller flux declines after 4 weeks immersion. In methylene blue (MB) solution, the blended membrane achieved a rejection rate of 70.99% and an FRR of 82.86%, underscoring its strong potential for wastewater treatment, particularly for the removal of charged dyes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: