Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fungicidal bioassays revealed new aromatic amide derivatives, targeting succinate dehydrogenase, suggesting enhanced activity against Rhizoctonia solani.
Based on analyzing the pharmacophore model of commercial succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicides, a molecular database was reasonably designed for computer-aided molecular design, and the potential heterocyclic oxime-ether-containing skeleton was found for derivation. A fungicidal bioassay indicated that the EC50 values of the compounds I-5 (2.23 μg/mL), I-6 (2.15 μg/mL), I-9 (0.07 μg/mL), and I-11 (0.81 μg/mL) showed better in vitro activity against Rhizoctonia solani than that of trifloxystrobin (4.88 μg/mL). Especially, I-9 showed comparable activity to thifluzamide, with EC50 of 0.07 μg/mL vs 0.06 μg/mL, and better activity than fluxapyroxad and boscalid, with EC50 of 0.10 and 2.49 μg/mL, respectively. Like thifluzamide and fluxapyroxad, compounds I-1, I-3, and I-9 showed excellent in vivo activity against R. solani at 200 μg/mL. The IC50 of the R. solani SDH (RsSDH) enzyme of compound I-9 was 0.35 μg/mL, which was near that of fluxapyroxad (0.28 μg/mL). The high potency of I-9 against RsSDH was also reflected in a steeper dose-response tendency in the fluorescence quenching assay, and it was well-docked into the active site of the target enzyme SDH. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies have provided a reasonable explanation for compound I-9 being able to act as a SDHI. Our studies supported that I-9 was a promising SDH-based fungicide highly active compound deserving of further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: