Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The analysis reveals Glushkov's dual model of management, encompassing both technical regulation and decision-making authority.
The article analyzes the OGAS project led by academician Viktor Glushkov through the lens of Michel Foucault’s theory of governmentality. Glushkov is often seen as a strict technocrat aiming to create an all-encompassing system of machine control, and his colleagues sometimes suspected him of focusing exclusively on technical regulation of socio-economic processes. However, this study reveals a more nuanced view. Glushkov’s vision of cybernetic management involved not only a system of machine analytics but also a «sovereign» decision-making element. This dual-structured management model exhibits self-similarity, becoming a «sovereign» authority over the established economic administration system, where adherence to automated regulations and circulars in turn generates an informal «sovereign» excess. This fractal nature of the OGAS project is further reflected in Glushkov’s historiosophical insights: by addressing the challenge of crossing the second information barrier, he illustrates how OGAS dialectically sublates the dualism between hierarchical politics and the commodity-money economy of the previous era, integrating their core aspects into a new unity of cyber-governmentality. Through this dialectical (Hegelian) approach, Glushkov underscores the necessity of sovereign, volitional intervention. At the same time, recognizing the vulnerability of this «sovereign» element, he proposed that a technically managed social environment could foster the emergence of a new form of subjectivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
I. Kobilin (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: