Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores the role of understanding and diagnosis in clinical medicine, highlighting symptoms' significance.
What is lost, if we don’t have a diagnosis? This article examines the aims of clinical medicine, and the role of understanding in this. Starting from a case prompt with a patient suffering from persistent physical symptoms, I argue that understanding is at the clinical core, and that the target of such understanding is the patient body with symptoms. Synthesising accounts of medical understanding and phenomenology of illness, I suggest that the understanding sought in the clinic extends beyond mechanistic explanation to include a sense of bodily intelligibility, and that diagnoses are useful but not necessary tools to this end.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helene Scott‐Fordsmand (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: