Quasi-experimental study shows significant improvement in clinical decision-making of nursing students receiving advanced trauma life support training.
Abstract Background and Objective: Trauma is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, especially in developing countries. Accurate clinical decision-making ability among nurses plays a crucial role in reducing trauma-related mortality and complications. Strengthening such skills during nursing education can better prepare students to effectively address clinical challenges they may face in real-world trauma care. This study aimed to determine the effect of an Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) simulation program on the clinical decision-making abilities of nursing students. Methods: This quasi-experimental study with a pre-test/post-test control group design was conducted in 2025 on 66 final-year nursing students at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Participants were assigned to intervention (n = 31) and control (n = 35) groups. The intervention group received advanced trauma life support simulation training. Data were collected using a researcher-made clinical decision-making questionnaire and analyzed using paired t-test, repeated measures ANOVA, and interaction effects tests. Results: The mean clinical decision-making score in the intervention group increased from 40.81 ± 3.22 before the intervention to 52.24 ± 2.04 after the intervention. In the control group, the mean scores were 39.06 ± 2.27 before and 48.09 ± 1.97 after the study period. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that time (F = 601.08, p < 0.001), group (F = 47.26, p < 0.001), and the interaction of time and group (F = 8.23, p = 0.006) had significant effects on clinical decision-making ability. The improvement in the intervention group was significantly greater than in the control group. Conclusions: The Advanced Trauma Life Support simulation program significantly enhanced the clinical decision-making abilities of nursing students. This program is recommended for incorporation into formal nursing education to enhance clinical care quality and reduce medical errors among nursing students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohebi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: