This response critiques Moen's understanding of republican doctrine and its implications for modern politics.
Republicanism and liberalism have long been regarded as rival political doctrines, although the exact nature and degree of that rivalry has always been subject to debate. In a new contribution to this debate, Moen's The Republican Dilemma argues that republicans face an unavoidable choice between adopting a moderate interpretation of republican doctrine suitable for modern political conditions, but indistinguishable from liberalism in practice; or a strong interpretation distinct from liberalism, but out of step with modern political conditions. This response argues that Moen has misunderstood key aspects of republican theory, and thus his critique ultimately misses its target.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank Lovett (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: