Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 27, 2025The Journal of Higher EducationOpen Access

Countering Racist Gaslighting in Education Policy and Politics: A Critical Race Discourse Analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RVRican VueKLKatrya Txay Ly

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Critical race discourse analysis examines how anti-gaslighting strategies reshape education policy, highlighting BIPOC epistemologies and oppressive engagements.

Key Points

  • Legislators opposing bans on race-conscious education effectively counter racist gaslighting in policy debates through strategic refusal.
  • Analysis of 19 hours of legislative debates from seven states reveals new political imaginaries grounded in BIPOC epistemologies.
  • This study employs critical race discourse analysis to understand how liberatory discourses shape education policy and social arrangements.
  • Conceptualizing anti-gaslighting as a praxis highlights its role in advancing epistemic justice and unsettling dominant logics in education.

Cite This Study

Vue et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7b3d4eebfec0fc52363c4https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2025.2558452
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The discursive tactics of perpetuating white normativity in public education: A critical policy discourse analysis of anti-CRT policies across 18 states2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Racial Gaslighting2026
  3. 3Reactionary Speech: The Art of Political Gaslighting2026
  4. 4(Re)setting the racial narrative: Antiblackness and educational censorship2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5A Content Analysis Investigating the Framing of Anti-CRT Laws and Their Impacts on Social Studies Teacher Agency2025