This analysis compares corrosion performance among open-cell AlSn6Cu composites, indicating ceramic type and porosity significantly influence outcomes.
The corrosion behavior of open-cell AlSn6Cu-based composites, one reinforced with SiC particles and the other with Al2O3 particles, was investigated. The composites were fabricated via liquid-state processing, employing both squeeze casting and the replication method, and they produced in two distinct pore size ranges (800–1000 µm and 1000–1200 µm). Corrosion performance was systematically evaluated through gravimetric (weight loss) measurements and electrochemical techniques, including open-circuit potential monitoring and potentiodynamic polarization tests. Comprehensive microstructural and phase analyses were conducted using X-ray diffraction, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The results revealed that both reinforcement type and pore architecture have a significant impact on corrosion resistance. Al2O3-reinforced composites consistently outperformed their SiC-containing counterparts, and pore enlargement generally improved performance for the unreinforced alloy and the Al2O3 composite but not for the SiC composite. Overall, the optimal corrosion resistance is achieved by pairing a coarser-pore architecture (1000–1200 µm) with Al2O3 reinforcement, which minimizes both instantaneous (electrochemical) and cumulative (gravimetric) corrosion metrics. This study addresses a gap in current research by providing the first detailed assessment of corrosion in open-cell AlSn6Cu-based composites with controlled pore architectures and different ceramic reinforcements, offering valuable insights for the development of advanced lightweight materials for harsh environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolev et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: