Systematic review and meta-analysis reveal a strong link between flexible work arrangements and work-life balance in SMEs, suggesting ways to enhance worker well-being.
Flexible work arrangements (FWA) deployment in the small and medium enterprise (SME) sector is increasing due to digitalization, alongside the COVID-19 aftermath reorganization. Deployment, nonetheless, has limitations in terms of resource deficiency, technological gap, and organizational preparedness. Work-life balance (WLB) significantly influences worker fulfillment, retention, and work efficacy. Pattern analysis, barriers, and contributors to acceptance of flexible work arrangements (FWA) alongside work-life balance (WLB) in SMEs, particularly in the developing world, provide evidence-informed optimization guidelines. Systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines covered 47 high-quality works in five databases (2018-2024). Meta-analysis employed random-effects schemes in an extensive statistical analysis of 52,847 participants. Meta-analysis demonstrated a robust positive correlation between FWA-WLB (r = 0.614, 95% CI: 0.563-0.661, p < 0.001) with moderate-to-large magnitude (Cohen's d = 0.67). Substantial heterogeneity (I² = 72.4%) of settings existed. Spatial flexibility (β = 0.641) as well as temporal flexibility (β = 0.596) significantly influenced. Job autonomy (β = 0.34), time control (β = 0.31), and stress reduction (β = 0.27) mediated 58.2% of variance. FWA significantly constructs work-life balance in varied settings, with variation by industrial sector, culture, and deployment. SMEs can optimize worker well-being through optimized strategies by focusing on deployment barriers through strategic utilization of resources alongside support by the stakeholders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Purnawan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: