Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals sociopolitical conflicts, urban planning impacts, and evolving labour flows in Beirut.
Examining the early post-colonial Beirut International Airport (BEY), we make two arguments. First, BEY had the potential to become the Middle East’s largest airport only because from the mid-1800s Beirut, which had a large maritime port, had been the Arab East’s global cultural, commercial, communications and transport hub, which created a path dependency. Second, BEY deepened Beirut’s regional-global role throughout the 1960s, making it an aero-city piggybacking on a port-city. We explore four dimensions. First, in urban planning, the government was exceptionally interventionist where BEY was concerned; second, BEY’s construction triggered sociopolitical conflicts; third, BEY intersected with Palestinian and Lebanese unskilled labour flows; and, finally, air-travel, including tourism, affected Beirut’s cityscape deeply yet unevenly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cyrus Schayegh (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: