This research developed molecular assays to detect root- and butt-rot diseases, suggesting effective management tools for western redcedar.
Western redcedar (Thuja plicata, WRC) root- and butt-rot diseases are caused by a set of wood-decay fungal pathogens, which have posed a significant threat to forest health and resulted in substantial economic losses of WRC production. Traditional approaches for disease detection are labour-intensive and more suitable on matured trees at late infection stages. This study developed and validated internal transcribed spacer region next-generation sequencing (ITS-NGS) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays for detecting decay-disease infections in WRC seedlings with high sensitivity and specificity. Efficiencies of ITS-PCR amplification were in silico predicted and validated through ITS-NGS using pure fungal DNA mixture. For diagnosis of decay pathogens in WRC seedlings, fine root and root collar samples were collected from greenhouse inoculation trials. ITS-NGS identified positive infection rates of 100% for Armillaria ostoyae, Heterobasidion occidentale, and Poriella subacida in diseased seedlings but the diagnostic efficiency for Coniferiporia weirii was affected by the types of sampled tissues. Species-specific qPCR assays were developed for C. weirii and they revealed positive infection rates up to 100% in inoculated seedlings. Relative fungal abundances measured by ITS-NGS and qPCR were highly comparable with significant correlation, demonstrating the reliability of both molecular diagnostic approaches. Moreover, qPCR provided higher quantification accuracy for a trace amount of pathogen in total DNA extracted from host tissues. These results provided evidence for application of ITS-NGS and qPCR assay as robust and reliable molecular tools for detecting early and latent infections of fungal pathogens in complex tissue samples for enhancing WRC disease management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Houston et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: