This analysis finds implications of epistemic modality and evidentiality in French object clauses using impersonal constructions.
This article examines impersonal constructions with the verbs sembler and paraître in the main clause of complex sentences introducing object clauses in modern French. The structuralsemantic analysis enabled to identify various structural types of these constructions (il semble que, il me semble que, il paraît que and il me paraît que) as well as to clarify and classify their meanings. The focus is made on epistemic and related evidential meanings of the patterns. An attempt is made to establish the relationship between structural types of the constructions and their epistemic (probability, certainty, supposition, impression, etc.) and evidential (inferential, quotative evidentiality) meanings. It is argued that the patterns with the verbs sembler and paraître belong to mixed (bicategorial) markers of the French language being the boundary phenomenon between epistemic modality and evidentiality. The analysis of the semantics of the patterns enabled to conclude that, firstly, their evidential and epistemic meanings were closely related to each other, since the nature of the source of information could influence the degree of speaker’s certainty about the reliability of the information. Secondly, the meanings appeared not to be expressed equally: certain patterns might belong to the domain of the category of evidentiality or epistemic modality to a greater or lesser extent. Finally, the meanings expressed by the patterns were directly related to the speaker's assumption of responsibility for the reliability of the reported fact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daria O. Bestuzheva (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: