Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 28, 2025Indian Journal of Dental ResearchOpen Access

A Comparison of Two Commonly Employed Impression Methods for Multiple Splinted Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients - An In vitro Study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VSVidushi SaxenaSPSalil PawahMGManisha Gulati

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

In vitro study compares accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression methods for dental implants, suggesting both techniques may be interchangeable.

Key Points

  • Both impression materials showed nearly equal accuracy in transferring implant positions.
  • Polyvinyl siloxane indicated slightly better accuracy, although not statistically significant.
  • The study used comparative techniques with measurements analyzed for precision in edentulous patients.
  • Findings suggest both materials and tray types provide clinically acceptable results for dental applications.

Cite This Study

Saxena et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d9052941e1c178a14f588fhttps://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_438_24
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Clinical Comparison of Dental impression accuracy between One-step and Two-step Dual phase impression technique by using Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material.2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of positional accuracy in multiple implants using four different splinting materials: An in vitro study2018 · 15 citations
  3. 3Accuracy of Implant Impressions with Different Impression Coping Types and Shapes2009 · 67 citations
  4. 4Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: Influence of tray material, impression material, and time2002 · 196 citations
  5. 5The Effect of Implant Angulation on the Transfer Accuracy of External‐Connection Implants2013 · 20 citations