Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assessment reveals significant SO2 emissions in Baja California Sur, highlighting risks and pollution sources.
This work assesses sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from two power plants in Baja California Sur, Mexico, using ground-based UV camera measurements and AERMOD dispersion modeling. Field campaigns conducted during 2022 in La Paz and Puerto San Carlos captured spatial and temporal variations in SO2 slant column densities (SCDs) and fluxes, revealing higher emissions at the larger Punta Prieta (CTPP) thermoelectric power facility (mean flux: 1.13 kg s−1) compared to the Agustín Olachea (CCI AO) internal combustion power plant (mean flux: 0.59 kg s−1). The UV camera effectively monitored plume structure and dynamics, with error analyses indicating uncertainties of ~12% in flux estimates. AERMOD simulations showed ground-level SO2 concentrations exceeding WHO and Mexican air quality standards near the plants, with localized exposure risks particularly for workers. The results underscore the substantial contribution of these facilities to regional SO2 pollution and demonstrate the utility of combining remote sensing with modeling to assess industrial emissions and inform air quality management in sensitive regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schiavo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: