Multicenter exome study identifies genetic variants in short stature due to small for gestational age, suggesting important implications for diagnosis.
Context Most infants born small for gestational age (SGA) experience catch-up growth within two years, while 10‒15% remain short. The cause of this persistent growth failure remains unknown. Objective To investigate the genetic causes of SGA with short stature (SGA-SS) due to failure of catch-up growth. Methods A total of 191 children from multicenter SGA-SS cohorts across seven hospitals in South Korea underwent whole-exome sequencing. Identified copy number variants (CNVs) were confirmed via chromosomal microarray analysis. Results Genetic variants were identified in 34 children (17.8% diagnostic rate). CNVs accounted for 50% (17/34), including six children with 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome, predominantly exhibiting mild dysmorphic features without severe intellectual disability (ID), developmental delay (DD) or severe anomalies. Single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) were identified in 17 children (17/34, 50%). One had compound heterozygous mutations in SLC26A2, one likely pathogenic mutation, and another of uncertain significance. The remaining children had heterozygous variants, including 5 pathogenic variants in COL2A1, ACAN, SALL1, TAOK1, ANKRD11 and 11 likely pathogenic variants in PIK3R1, PLAG1, SCUBE3, COL9A2 [in two patients], SMAD4, PTPN11 [in two patients], CDKN1C, ACAN, NF1. A novel familial Silver-Russell syndrome case was linked to a CDKN1C mutation. Genetic causes were identified in 14 (58.3%) of 24 patients with ID/DD: 9 with CNVs and 5 with SNVs. Conclusion SGA-SS has a heterogeneous genetic basis, with CNVs significantly contributing. The variable presentation of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome highlights its relevance. A genetic diagnosis is more likely in familial cases or those with ID/DD, supporting the utility of genetic testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: