Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical model clarifies how supervision roles influence cognitive and evaluative components in psychologists.
In modern conditions professional training of psychologists pays attention to the development of thinking in future specialists, including through participation in supervision meetings. The article considers the correlation between the roles of participants in polymodal group supervision (supervisee, active participant and observer) and the components of the structure of a psychologist’s professional thinking, which is proposed in the author’s model. The aim of the study is the theoretical explain how different role positions help to form four components of professional thinking: procedural, content-related (cognitive), motivational-value and reflective-evaluative. The scientific novelty of the study lies in clarifying the role of polymodal supervision in the development of pro-fessional thinking and in systematizing ideas about which aspects of thinking are formed in each role position. An analytical model is proposed that helps to structurally consider the contribution of participation in different roles to the formation of the components of professional thinking. Thus, supervision in the context of changing role positions is seen as an important resource for professional development and can be used for educational purposes in building the individual development path of future psychologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elena V. Telmanova (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: