Cohort study reveals clarithromycin resistance significantly reduces treatment success in patients with H. pylori infection, highlighting the need for tailored therapy.
Background Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection is a major cause of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Rising clarithromycin resistance has significantly reduced the efficacy of standard triple therapy. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the prevalence and impact of antibiotic resistance remain incompletely defined, limiting the development of effective treatment strategies. Methods and Aims This study evaluated the feasibility and clinical utility of detecting clarithromycin resistance genes using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) on stored Rapid Urease Test (RUT) samples—a relatively novel application of molecular diagnostics. We also assessed the association between resistance status and treatment outcomes following empiric first‐line triple therapy. Patients with positive RUT tests during gastroscopy were treated with omeprazole‐based triple therapy and followed up with H. pylori stool antigen testing to confirm eradication. Results Among 84 patients, clarithromycin resistance genes were detected in 13 (15.5%). Overall eradication was achieved in 74 (88.1%) patients. However, eradication success was significantly lower in those with resistance (38.5%) compared to those without (97.2%, p < 0.001). Infection burden, treatment regimen, and duration were not associated with eradication rates, supporting resistance status as the primary determinant of treatment outcome. Resistance rates were similar between Māori and Pacific patients (18.2%) and other ethnic groups (14.8%), although sample sizes limited definitive conclusions. Conclusions ddPCR testing on stored RUT samples is a feasible and effective method for detecting clarithromycin resistance. This study demonstrates that clarithromycin resistance, rather than infection burden, treatment regimen, or duration, drives eradication failure in New Zealand. Tailored therapy based on molecular resistance testing may enhance treatment success and support antibiotic stewardship. These findings justify the development of PCR‐guided treatment pathways and provide a strong rationale for extending this approach to non‐invasive stool‐based testing suitable for use in primary care and screening programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inns et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: