This study demonstrates enhanced electrochemical performance and biocompatibility in TiO2@C core-shell nanowires, suggesting its potential for neural interfaces.
The selection of materials for neural interface electrodes relies heavily on two key criteria: electrochemical performance and biocompatibility. Carbon-based nanomaterials have attracted significant attention in neural interface research due to their excellent electrical conductivity, biocompatibility, and mechanical stability. However, achieving desirable electrochemical properties typically requires high-temperature synthesis (>1000 °C), which limits their integration with temperature-sensitive substrates and restricts broader device compatibility. In this study, we investigate TiO2@C core-shell nanowires (NWs) synthesized at a low temperature of 320 °C via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), followed by in situ annealing at 450 °C, 550 °C, and 650 °C for durations of 1, 3, and 5 hours. We systematically evaluated their charge storage capacity, electrochemical impedance, long-term cycling stability, and in vitro biocompatibility. The 5 nm carbon shell, in situ annealed at 650 °C for 3 hours, demonstrated the highest areal capacitance of 874.4 μF cm-2 at 50 mV s-1 and a low impedance of 2.1 kΩ at 1 kHz, with 92% capacitance retention after 1000 cyclic voltammetry (CV) cycles. In addition, the electrode maintained stable performance across a range of scan rates, indicating resilience under dynamic stimulation conditions. Initial cell culture assays using HeLa cells confirmed the coating's cytocompatibility, supporting viable and non-cytotoxic cellular activity comparable to conventional substrates. These results highlight the potential of moderate-temperature synthesized TiO2@C core-shell nanowires as high-performance, biocompatible electrode materials with improved compatibility for integration into diverse neural interface platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sait et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: