New sleep questionnaire reveals high prevalence of sleep disorders in the UK Biobank, suggesting significant implications for mental health.
Study Objectives: Our study introduced the 2023 UK Biobank sleep questionnaire and described variation in sleep health dimensions and prevalence of disordered sleep. Methods: A questionnaire comprising validated measures and bespoke items was developed to capture key self-reported domains of sleep health and symptoms of sleep disorders. We quantified cohort prevalence of operationally defined sleep disorders and assessed patterning of sleep health dimensions across key sociodemographic and clinically relevant variables. Results: 327,752 individuals were invited of whom 185,056 (56.5%) completed at least one module and were included in the analysis. Respondents were predominately from a White ethnic background (96.8%), had a mean age of 69.9 (SD, 7.5) years, 57.9% were female, and 25.5% were in employment. Compared to non-respondents, respondents were more likely to be female, tended to be better educated, healthier, and exhibit lower levels of socioeconomic deprivation, although baseline sleep variables were similar between respondents and non-respondents. Around 40% of respondents reported sleep duration less than 7 hours and 49% reported poor sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index > 5). Approximately one-quarter (25.2%) met criteria for at least one operationally defined sleep disorder, with insomnia being the most common (14.4%) followed by obstructive sleep apnoea (8.0%), restless legs syndrome (4.1%), and frequent nightmares (3.7%). Sleep disorders were associated with higher levels of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and cognitive complaints. Conclusions: Poor sleep quality and operationally defined sleep disorders are common in the UK Biobank cohort. Sleep questionnaire data can now be integrated with a range of biomedical information to advance understanding of sleep.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tse et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: