This study demonstrates rapid tests for milk quality and identifies common adulterants, ensuring safety.
Milk quality assessment is critical to ensure safety and prevent adulteration in dairy supply chains. This study outlines rapid, cost-effective methods for evaluating milk quality at collection points, including sensory inspection, heat-induced solidification or clot on boiling (C.O.B), Alcohol Coagulation, Lacto scan, Milk Density, Freezing Point, Inhibitor, Phosphatase, and tests for adulterants like cane sugar, urea, formalin, starch, and soaps/detergents. Organoleptic tests rely on sensory evaluation to detect abnormal smell, taste, or appearance, indicating issues like bacterial contamination or acidification (pH < 6.4). The C.O.B. and Alcohol Coagulation tests identify high acidity (pH < 5.8) or protein instability, signaling unsuitable milk for processing. The Alcohol-Alizarin test provides dual insights into protein stability and pH via color changes. Lacto scan offers precise compositional analysis, measuring fat, solids-not-fat (SNF), proteins, and more. Density and freezing point tests detect water adulteration, while inhibitor and phosphatase tests ensure safety by identifying antibiotics or inadequate pasteurization. Adulterant-specific tests reveal cane sugar, urea, formalin, starch, or detergents, safeguarding consumer health. These methods, requiring minimal equipment, enable rapid quality control, ensuring only safe, high-quality milk enters the supply chain. Generally, enhancing test sensitivity to identify lower levels of adulterants and incorporating automated systems for real-time monitoring could be the main goals of future developments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Getachew et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: