Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot study demonstrates CBT Trainer improves training for therapists through AI interactions, suggesting a new approach for skill development.
BACKGROUND Training challenges in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) include limited supervised practice with diverse cases, inconsistent feedback, resource-intensive supervision, and difficulties standardising competence assessment. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of CBT Trainer, a mobile application for training CBT practitioners through the use of standardized AI patient interactions and the evaluation of therapist responses against competence frameworks to enable structured skill development grounded in experiential learning and deliberate practice. METHODS This mixed-methods pilot study employed a two-stage approach. Stage 1 involved usability testing with four participants. Stage 2 included 59 participants from psychological practitioner training programs (a Low Intensity CBT Interventions Programme and a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology) who engaged with the CBT Trainer over one month. Measures of impact included the System Usability Scale (SUS), platform engagement, post-study questionnaire on perceived learning outcomes and qualitative feedback. RESULTS CBT Trainer performed well on all pre-specified outcome targets. Participants spent an average of 95.24 minutes (SD=134.58) in roleplays, completed an average of 4.15 role-play sessions (SD=3.55), with 49.69 interactions per session. Platform usability was rated as excellent (mean SUS=82.20, SD=12.93). Self-reported competence improvement was highest in assessment skills (96.7%), followed by information gathering (66.7%). Key advantages over traditional methods included immediate feedback (83.3%) and convenience (73.3%). CONCLUSIONS This pilot study provides evidence that an AI-based patient simulation shows promise as a supplementary training tool for CBT therapists, particularly regarding accessibility and immediate feedback. Future research should employ randomized controlled designs with objective competence assessments. CLINICALTRIAL The study protocol was pre-registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/mskb7).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: