Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative content analysis reveals key differences in statistics curricula, suggesting improvements in Thailand's approach to statistical literacy and probability.
Achieving quality education, a central objective of the Sustainable Development Goals, remains a persistent challenge in Thailand. Addressing this issue necessitates critical reflection on the opportunities afforded by the school curriculum, which serves as a foundation for societal development. This study examined Thailand’s intended statistics curriculum, analyzed its structure and key concepts, and compared them with those of New Zealand’s statistics curriculum. A qualitative content analysis approach was employed, using deductive content analysis to examine the official statistics curricula of both countries at the primary and lower secondary levels. The results revealed structural similarities and differences between the curricula. While New Zealand integrated statistical investigation, statistical literacy, and probability as interconnected components, the Thai curriculum addressed these elements separately. Regarding key concepts, the two curricula demonstrated similar coverage but differed in the degree of emphasis placed on particular concepts. This study underscores the benefits of introducing probability at an earlier stage, fostering statistical literacy using authentic data, and highlighting the interrelatedness of key statistical concepts. Future research should extend beyond analysis of the intended curriculum to investigate how students engage with statistical concepts in classroom contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhanachat Anuniwat (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: