Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis compares fractional order PID and classical PID controllers on gyroscope dynamics, highlighting efficiency in tracking accuracy.
This article presents a comparison between a classical PID controller and a fractional-order PID (FOPID) controller for a gyroscope with Cardan suspension (3 DOF). A gyroscope dynamics model accounting for gyroscopic couplings and viscous damping is adopted, while the FOPID controller is implemented in discrete form using the Grünwald–Letnikov (GL) operator, which reduces smoothly to the classical PID when λ = μ = 1. The effectiveness of both strategies is assessed in a moving-target tracking task using the IAE (tracking accuracy) and ISC (control effort) indices. MATLAB/Simulink R2025a simulations (ode4, Δt = 2 × 10−4 s) show that, under cross-axis couplings of the gyroscope suspension, FOPID yields smaller tracking errors and smoother control signals than PID. The results indicate the usefulness of fractional-order controllers in gyroscope control systems and provide a basis for further experimental studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krzysztofik et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: