Bibliometric analysis reveals trends in facial reanimation surgery articles, indicating gaps in research quality and patient outcomes.
Facial paralysis profoundly affects physical, psychological, and social well-being. Facial reanimation surgery (FRS) uses various static and dynamic procedures to restore function and appearance. This bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited FRS articles identifies trends, gaps, and methodological quality, offering insights into the field's evolution, guiding future research, and supporting evidence-based clinical practices to enhance patient outcomes. The top 100 most-cited articles related to FRS were identified through a comprehensive Web of Science search covering publications from 1976 to 2024. Data including citation count, study focus, and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence (LOEs) were extracted. The most-cited articles on FRS amassed a total of 6872 citations, involving 5601 patients, with citations per article ranging from 31 to 535. Most studies were LOE 3 (n = 52), with fewer at higher evidence levels (LOEs 1 and 2). Surgical technique was the primary focus (n = 65), whereas validated patient-reported outcome measures appeared in only 8 studies. Our findings highlight the need for better research methods and wider use of validated patient-reported outcome measures in FRS studies. Standardized tools and high-quality, multicenter research are crucial for improving patient care. This analysis offers insights into FRS evolution and recommends collaborative, interdisciplinary studies to advance the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gentile et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: