Systematic review assesses fractal analysis to differentiate OPGs of bruxers from non-bruxers, suggesting potential diagnostic advancement.
Background: Traditional diagnostic methods for bruxism often rely on subjective assessments. Recently, fractal analysis (FA)—a mathematical method used to quantify complex structures—has gained attention as a noninvasive radiographic tool to evaluate trabecular bone changes. Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the application of FA in differentiating digital orthopantomographs (OPGs) of individuals with bruxism from those without. Materials and Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across five databases to identify studies evaluating fractal dimension on OPGs of bruxers. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and the QUADAS-2 tool were employed to evaluate the risk of bias. Results: Out of 18 studies identified, 10 met the eligibility criteria, encompassing a total of 1666 participants. Four studies reported higher fractal dimensions in bruxers, three reported lower fractal dimensions, and three found no significant difference. Sex-related differences were inconsistently reported across studies. The QUADAS-2 assessment indicated moderate overall quality, with concerns regarding patient selection, reference standards, and variations in study design. Conclusion: FA offers insights into mandibular structural changes in bruxers; however, inconsistencies in methodology and results underscore the necessity for standardized FA protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayaraj et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: