October 1, 2025International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Open Access

Comparative Study of General Anaesthesia and Spinal Anaesthesia in Pre-Eclampsia Patients Undergoing Emergency Caesarean Section

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

DSDeepak Kumar SinhaShiv Nadar University SVSumit Kumar VermaMedway NHS Foundation Trust HKHirday KumarNarayan Medical College and Hospital

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This comparative study evaluates maternal and neonatal outcomes using general and spinal anaesthesia in pre-eclamptic patients, suggesting tailored anaesthesia selection.

Key Points

Spinal anaesthesia resulted in better maternal hemodynamic stability compared to general anaesthesia, which increased cardiovascular stress.
General anaesthesia led to higher heart rates and systolic blood pressure, while spinal anaesthesia required more vasopressor support due to hypotension.
Neonatal Apgar scores were significantly higher in general anaesthesia patients, yet NICU admissions remained comparable between both groups.
Patients in the spinal anaesthesia group had shorter hospital stays, highlighting its potential advantages in maternal recovery despite procedural complications.

Cite This Study

Sinha et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91cbfe798ba2fc498704 https://doi.org/10.21275/sr25909225033

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This comparative study evaluates maternal and neonatal outcomes using general and spinal anaesthesia in pre-eclamptic patients, suggesting tailored anaesthesia selection.

Comparative Study of General Anaesthesia and Spinal Anaesthesia in Pre-Eclampsia Patients Undergoing Emergency Caesarean Section

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Comparative Study of General Anaesthesia and Spinal Anaesthesia in Pre-Eclampsia Patients Undergoing Emergency Caesarean Section

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider