Analysis shows external limiting membrane defects correlate with AMD severity and ellipsoid zone defects, suggesting underlying mechanisms.
To assess the prevalence and associations of external limiting membrane (ELM) defects on optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images in a general population, affected by age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or free of any retinal disease. Using OCT images, we assessed the ELM defect presence in participants of the population-based Beijing Eye Study. The study population consisted of 712 (44.2%) eyes with early AMD, 295 (18.3%) eyes with intermediate AMD, 12 (0.7%) eyes with geographic atrophy and 592 (36.7%) eyes without signs of AMD. ELM defect prevalence increased from 6/592 (1.0%; 95% CI: 0.0, 2.0) in the normal group to 57/712 (8.0%; 95% CI: 6.0, 10.0), 117/295 (39.7%; 95% CI: 34.2, 45.2) and 11/12 (91.7%; 95% CI: 73.7, 100) in the group with early AMD stage, intermediate AMD and late AMD stage, respectively. Higher ELM defect prevalence was spatially associated with higher prevalence of ellipsoid zone (EZ) defects (OR: 929; 95% CI: 291-2964; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, higher ELM defect prevalence correlated with higher AMD stage (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.33, 3.71; p = 0.002), higher prevalence of intraretinal hyperreflective foci (iHRFs) superior to the EZ/ELM (OR: 29.7; 95% CI: 8.69-102; p < 0.001), lower prevalence of iHRFs beneath the EZ/ELM (OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.35; p < 0.001) and higher prevalence of localized interdigitation zone thinnings (IZTs) (OR: 5.66; 95% CI: 3.14, 10.2; p < 0.001). The spatial correlation between ELM defects and EZ defects, the associations of both defect types with a higher occurrence of iHRFs superior to the ELM, the association between an absence of ELM defects and a higher prevalence of iHRFs located inferior to the ELM, and the association between a higher ELM defect prevalence and higher IZT prevalence may suggest the ELM/EZ may act as a barrier for RPE cells migrating into the retina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: