Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights the evolution of management strategies for locally advanced rectal cancer, suggesting personalized approaches via multidisciplinary care.
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has evolved significantly over the past century, driven by a deeper understanding of tumor biology, technological advancements, and multidisciplinary approaches. This article reviews the historical progression of LARC management, emphasizing the latest breakthroughs that are reshaping treatment paradigms. Key developments include the watch and wait strategy for patients achieving a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy, the emergence of total neoadjuvant therapy as a standard approach, and the adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Watch and wait may reduce treatment-related morbidity and help preserve anorectal function, but it requires rigorous patient selection and close long-term surveillance to ensure oncologic safety. Additionally, the role of targeted therapies and immunotherapy is gaining prominence, offering new opportunities for personalized treatment. These innovations aim to improve oncological outcomes while minimizing morbidity and preserving organ function, ultimately enhancing patients' quality of life. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in optimizing patient selection, refining treatment strategies, and ensuring long-term safety and efficacy. A multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, oncologists, and radiation specialists is crucial to tailoring therapies to individual patient profiles. As research continues, integrating novel therapeutic strategies will be key to further improving survival rates and reducing treatment-related morbidity in LARC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García-Fernández et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: