Cross-sectional analysis of physical activity, energy expenditure, and BMI differences by gender in students.
Purpose: The present study aimed to assess the PA levels in first-year Slovak university students, with an analysis of differences in the amount of energy expenditure related to PA, the intensity and frequency of PA undertaken by them according to gender and BMI category. Methods: The research was conducted among 1,665 first-year university students from all public universities in Slovakia. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form (IPAQ-SF) was used to assess PA levels, and information on body weight and height was used to calculate body mass index (BMI). A total of 1,314 questionnaires were included in the final analysis. Results: The results of our study indicate that more than 76% of students engage in moderate or high levels of PA, with over 41% achieving a high PA level. Comparison of the energy expenditure of male and female students according to the IPAQ-SF protocol clearly confirmed that women are less physically active than men (P≤ .001). The analysis of differences in energy expenditure between underweight, normal-weight, and overweight/obese subjects showed no statistically significant differences within each PA level, but underweight participants spent significantly more time sitting than normal-weight individuals (P= .023). Additionally, underweight individuals had significantly lower energy expenditure for TPA compared to overweight/obese individuals (P= .034). Conclusions: An interesting, albeit unexpected, finding that contradicts common assumptions is the observation that underweight students spend significantly more time sitting than those with normal weight. Further research should explore potential explanations for this phenomenon. Psychological factors, such as depression, anxiety, or eating disorders, may contribute to reduced appetite, increased fatigue, and subsequently, lower PA engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buková et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: