Simulation demonstrates the effectiveness of a new Bayesian model updating framework for structural health monitoring, incorporating temperature effects.
Finite element (FE) models are widely used in structural health monitoring to represent real structures and assess their condition, but discrepancies often arise between numerical and actual structural behavior due to simplifying assumptions, uncertain parameters, and environmental influences. Temperature variation, in particular, significantly affects structural stiffness and modal properties, yet it is often treated as noise in traditional model updating methods. This study treats temperature changes as valuable information for model updating and structural damage quantification. The Bayesian model updating approach (BMUA) is a probabilistic approach that updates uncertain model parameters by combining prior knowledge with measured data to estimate their posterior probability distributions. However, traditional BMUA methods assume mass is known and only update stiffness. A novel BMUA framework is proposed that incorporates thermal buckling and temperature-dependent stiffness estimation and introduces an algorithm to eliminate the coupling effect between mass and stiffness by using temperature-induced stiffness changes. This enables the simultaneous updating of both parameters. The framework is validated through numerical simulations on a three-story aluminum shear frame under uniform and non-uniform temperature distributions. Under healthy and uniform temperature conditions, stiffness parameters were estimated with high accuracy, with errors below 0.5% and within uncertainty bounds, while mass parameters exhibited errors up to 13.8% that exceeded their extremely low standard deviations, indicating potential model bias. Under non-uniform temperature distributions, accuracy declined, particularly for localized damage cases, with significant deviations in both parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adhikari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: