Cross-sectional study examines seroprevalence of anti-HBc and anti-HBs in blood donors, indicating vaccination impact.
Background/Objectives: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a persistent challenge for transfusion safety. Although testing for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and nucleic acid testing (NAT) reduces transmission risk, antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) provide additional insight into past infection and vaccine-induced immunity. We aimed to determine their seroprevalence among blood donors in southern Croatia and assess associations with age, occupation, and time since vaccination. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between February and November 2024 at two regional transfusion centers in southern Croatia. A total of 1008 voluntary blood donors, all HBsAg- and NAT-negative, were tested for anti-HBc and anti-HBs using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Demographic and vaccination data were collected through verified medical records. Results: Anti-HBc was detected in 0.5% of donors, exclusively among the unvaccinated. Protective anti-HBs levels were found in 38.1% overall and 70.6% of vaccinated donors, with significant declines by age and more than 15 years post-vaccination (p = 0.024). Healthcare workers showed higher seroprotection than non-healthcare donors (67.0% vs. 35.1%; p < 0.001), although one-third still lacked protective levels. Conclusions: HBV exposure was rare, but waning vaccine-induced immunity was evident, with protective anti-HBs levels in 70.6% of vaccinated donors, declining with age and time since vaccination. These findings highlight the need for periodic monitoring of anti-HBs and targeted booster strategies, especially in older and occupationally exposed groups. HBsAg and NAT provide a high level of transfusion safety, while the role of routine anti-HBc testing in this low-endemic context should be carefully evaluated in view of its potential benefits and drawbacks. Donor-based surveillance is a valuable tool for evaluating long-term vaccine effectiveness and guiding public health policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dilberović et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: